Recently, several datasets have become available which represent natural language phenomena as graphs. Hyperedge Replacement Languages (HRL) have been the focus of much attention as a formalism to represent the graphs in these datasets. Chiang et al. (2013) prove that HRL graphs can be parsed in polynomial time with respect to the size of the in- put graph. We believe that HRL are more expressive than is necessary to represent semantic graphs and we propose the use of Regular Graph Languages (RGL; Cour- celle 1991), which is a subfamily of HRL, as a possible alternative. We provide a top-down parsing algorithm for RGL that runs in time linear in the size of the input graph.

Distributions over strings and trees can be represented by probabilistic regular languages which characterize many models in natural language processing. Recently, several datasets have become available which represent natural language phenomena as graphs, so it is natural to ask whether there is an equivalent of probabilistic regular languages for graphs. This paper presents regular graph languages, a formalism due to Courcelle (1991) that has not previously studied in natural language processing. RGL is crucially a subfamily of both Hyperedge Replacement Languages (HRL), which can be made probabilistic; and Monadic Second Order Languages (MSOL), which are closed under intersection. We give an accessible introduction to Courcelle's proof that RGLs are in MSOL, providing clues about how RGL may relate to other recently introduced graph grammar formalisms.

"Words can be represented by composing the representations of subword units such as word segments, characters, and/or character n-grams. While such representations are effective and may capture the morphological regularities of words, they have not been systematically compared, and it is not understood how they interact with different morphological typologies. On a language modeling task, we present experiments that systematically vary (1) the basic unit of representation, (2) the composition of these representations, and (3) the morphological typology of the language modeled. Our results extend previous findings that character representations are effective across typologies, and we find that a previously unstudied combination of character trigram representations composed with bi-LSTMs outperforms most others. But we also find room for improvement: none of the character-level models match the predictive accuracy of a model with access to true morphological analyses, even when learned from an order of magnitude more data."

Generative models defining joint distributions over parse trees and sentences are useful for parsing and language modeling, but impose restrictions on the scope of features and are often outperformed by discriminative models. We propose a framework for parsing and language modeling which marries a generative model with a discriminative recognition model in an encoder-decoder setting. We provide interpretations of the framework based on expectation maximization and variational inference, and show that it enables parsing and language modeling within a single implementation. On the English Penn Treenbank, our framework obtains competitive performance on constituency parsing while matching the state-of-the-art single model language modeling score.

"Several corpora have been annotated with negation scope---the set of words whose meaning is negated by a cue like the word 'not'---leading to the development of classifiers that detect negation scope with high accuracy. We show that for nearly all of these corpora, this high accuracy can be attributed to a single fact: they frequently annotate negation scope as a single span of text delimited by punctuation. For negation scopes not of this form, detection accuracy is low and undersampling the easy training examples does not substantially improve accuracy. We demonstrate that this is partly an artifact of annotation guidelines, and we argue that future negation scope annotation efforts should focus on these more difficult cases."

We explore the problem of translating speech to text in low-resource scenarios where neither automatic speech recognition (ASR) nor machine translation (MT) are available, but we have training data in the form of audio paired with text translations. We present the first system for this problem applied to a realistic multi-speaker dataset, the CALLHOME Spanish-English speech translation corpus. Our approach uses unsupervised term discovery (UTD) to cluster repeated patterns in the audio, creating a pseudotext, which we pair with translations to create a parallel text and train a simple bag-of-words MT model. We identify the challenges faced by the system, finding that the difficulty of cross-speaker UTD results in low recall, but that our system is still able to correctly translate some content words in test data.

Recent work on unsupervised term discovery (UTD) aims to identify and cluster repeated word-like units from audio alone. These systems are promising for some very low-resource languages where transcribed audio is unavailable, or where no written form of the language exists. However, in some cases it may still be feasible (e.g., through crowdsourcing) to obtain (possibly noisy) text translations of the audio. If so, this information could be used as a source of side information to improve UTD. Here, we present a simple method for rescoring the output of a UTD system using text translations, and test it on a corpus of Spanish audio with English translations. We show that it greatly improves the average precision of the results over a wide range of system configurations and data preprocessing methods.

Existing corpora for intrinsic evaluation are not targeted towards tasks in informal domains such as Twitter or news comment forums. We want to test whether a representation of informal words fulfills the promise of eliding explicit text normalization as a preprocessing step. One possible evaluation metric for such domains is the proximity of spelling variants. We propose how such a metric might be computed and how a spelling variant dataset can be collected using UrbanDictionary

For many applications, the query speed of $N$-gram language models is a computational bottleneck. Although massively parallel hardware like GPUs offer a potential solution to this bottleneck, exploiting this hardware requires a careful rethinking of basic algorithms and data structures. We present the first language model designed for such hardware, using B-trees to maximize data parallelism and minimize memory footprint and latency. Compared with a single-threaded instance of KenLM (Heafield, 2011), a highly optimized CPU-based language model, our GPU implementation produces identical results with a smaller memory footprint and a sixfold increase in throughput on a batch query task. When we saturate both devices, the GPU delivers nearly twice the throughput per hardware dollar even when the CPU implementation uses faster data structures.

Automatic negation scope detection is a task that has been tackled using different classifiers and heuristics. Most systems are however 1) highly-engineered, 2) English-specific, and 3) only tested on the same genre they were trained on. We start by addressing 1) and 2) using a neural network architecture. Results obtained on data from the *SEM2012 shared task on negation scope detection show that even a simple feed-forward neural network using word-embedding features alone, performs on par with earlier classifiers, with a bi-directional LSTM outperforming all of them. We then address 3) by means of a specially-designed synthetic test set; in doing so, we explore the problem of detecting the negation scope more in depth and show that performance suffers from genre effects and differs with the type of negation considered.